Claude Poirier Reveals His Low Pay on “Chanteurs masqués”
Claude Poirier, the well-known former negotiator and journalist, recently made waves with a candid revelation about his short-lived participation on the popular television competition Chanteurs masqués . The fifth season of the show kicked off with a surprise when it was revealed that Poirier had been hiding behind the character “Buck le bûcheron.” But once his mask came off, his honesty took center stage more than the costume ever did.
After being eliminated, Poirier didn’t hesitate to share how little he actually enjoyed the experience. In fact, he admitted feeling a sense of relief when it was over. He described the week as “paralyzing,” not only because of the physical discomfort of wearing a heavy costume and hood, but also because of the restrictions imposed by the format of the competition.
Also Read:- Haaland Doubles but Dier Denies City in Monaco Thriller
- Greta Thunberg Detained in Gaza Aid Flotilla Interception
His blunt remarks came during an appearance on Dans les médias , hosted by Marie-Louise Arsenault. When the host suggested that the show might at least be financially rewarding, Poirier quickly shot that idea down. With his usual straightforward delivery, he declared, “It’s not profitable at all!” He then revealed the exact amount he was paid: 3,000 dollars. To him, this was far from a worthy exchange, given the stress and physical strain he endured. In his own words, it was “3,000 dollars for a week paralyzed with a hood.”
Poirier went on to explain that most contestants are professional singers used to performing on stage. In his view, people like him, who come from other fields, are used more as “test subjects.” He admitted that he accepted the invitation mainly because he had given his word, but once involved, he felt somewhat trapped. While he respects the immense popularity of Chanteurs masqués —which consistently dominates Sunday evening ratings in Canada—he was clear that the show didn’t leave him with fond memories.
Interestingly, while Poirier was openly critical of his own experience, he didn’t dismiss the efforts of the production team. He praised the quality of the show and acknowledged its success. Still, he emphasized that the personal cost, in terms of health and comfort, far outweighed the modest paycheck he received.
This frankness has sparked curiosity and conversation about what celebrities are really paid to appear on such hit programs. For viewers, the spectacle might look glamorous, but for someone like Poirier, it felt more like a burden than a thrill. His honesty, delivered in his trademark style, continues to entertain audiences—even if his masked singing didn’t.
In the end, Claude Poirier may not have enjoyed his time under the mask, but his unfiltered commentary has once again reminded the public why his voice, whether negotiating in high-stakes situations or critiquing a TV show, never goes unnoticed.
Read More:
0 Comments