Questions Rise Over US Strikes and the Fate of Drug Boat Survivors
So, let’s talk through this developing story involving recent US military strikes on suspected drug-running vessels and the very different ways survivors have been treated. It’s a complicated situation, and it’s drawing questions from lawmakers, legal experts, and the public because of how inconsistently these cases have been handled.
Over the past several months, a series of US strikes have targeted alleged narcotics-carrying boats across the Caribbean and the eastern Pacific. In total, 23 boats have been hit, and 87 people have been killed. What’s striking, though, is what happened in the handful of cases where people initially survived the explosions. Five survivors have been documented, and each case played out in a completely different way.
Also Read:- Palace Power Past Shelbourne in a One-Sided Night in Dublin
- Netflix Sets Date for Tyler Perry’s High-Stakes ‘Beauty in Black’ Return
One of the most scrutinized incidents happened on September 2. After the first strike disabled a vessel and left two survivors clinging to the overturned remains of their boat, a second strike was ordered. Those survivors were killed. Officials have said the decision was based on the belief that part of the vessel was still floating because cocaine was trapped inside, meaning the survivors might reach safety and continue trafficking. But legal experts quickly raised alarms, arguing that if those men were no longer able to fight, they should have been protected under the laws of armed conflict. Lawmakers demanded answers, and closed-door briefings were held on Capitol Hill to explain why the second strike was authorized.
Then came the next case on October 16, where the outcome couldn’t have been more different. Another suspected drug-carrying submersible was hit, two crew members were killed, and two others survived. This time, the survivors were rescued by the US Navy, medically treated, and eventually returned to their home countries of Ecuador and Colombia. Reports later revealed internal debates within the Pentagon about where to send them, including a proposal—rejected by the State Department—to transfer them to a notorious prison in El Salvador to avoid complicated legal challenges in the US.
And then there was the October 27 strike, when four boats were hit and a lone survivor was believed to have ended up in the water. Instead of picking him up, the US informed Mexico, and their navy launched a search. That person was never found and is now presumed dead.
What’s becoming clear is that the policy for handling survivors hasn’t officially changed, but the outcomes have varied dramatically depending on the moment, the location, and the perceived threat. Defense officials, including Secretary Pete Hegseth, insist the differences were based solely on circumstance, not shifting rules. But with the pace of strikes slowing and scrutiny growing, the debate over legality, morality, and accountability is only intensifying.
Read More:
0 Comments