US Strikes in the Pacific Raise New Questions Over Expanding Drug War
Right now, a serious and controversial story is unfolding far out in the Pacific Ocean, and it’s one that’s raising eyebrows in Washington and beyond. According to the US military, three more boats accused of drug trafficking were struck in international waters, and eight people were killed as a result. These latest strikes were confirmed by US Southern Command, which said the vessels had been moving along well-known narco-trafficking routes and were actively involved in transporting drugs.
The operation is part of a broader campaign known as Operation Southern Spear, which has been steadily expanding over the past few months. Since the campaign began, at least 95 people have reportedly been killed in similar strikes targeting suspected drug boats in both the Pacific and the Caribbean. Most of these attacks have been carried out using MQ-9 Reaper drones, allowing the US military to strike from a distance without putting American personnel directly in harm’s way.
Also Read:- Old Trafford Chaos as United and Bournemouth Trade Blows in Eight-Goal Thriller
- Hurricanes Reloaded as Nikhil Chaudhary Embraces a Bigger Role in Title Defence
US officials have described this effort as an “armed conflict” against drug cartels, a classification that has sparked intense debate. The Trump administration has argued that these groups pose a direct national security threat and has labeled those killed in the strikes as “unlawful combatants.” It has also been claimed that lethal force can be used without prior judicial review, based on a classified Justice Department finding.
However, criticism has been mounting. Legal experts and some lawmakers have questioned whether these strikes comply with international law, especially when they occur during peacetime and in international waters. Particular concern has been raised over an earlier incident in September, when a suspected drug boat was struck twice after survivors were detected following the first attack. That “double-tap” strike has been described by some experts as potentially illegal and possibly amounting to an extrajudicial killing.
In response to growing scrutiny, congressional oversight is now being ramped up. Senior officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, are expected to brief both the Senate and the House. Lawmakers from both parties have said the American public deserves clarity on how these decisions are being made and where the legal boundaries lie.
All of this is also unfolding against the backdrop of rising tensions with Venezuela. The US has increased military pressure in the region, imposed new sanctions, and even seized a tanker accused of moving sanctioned oil. Taken together, these actions suggest a much broader strategy that goes well beyond drug interdiction.
As these strikes continue, the central question remains unresolved: is this an effective and lawful way to combat global drug trafficking, or is it a dangerous escalation that risks crossing legal and moral lines? For now, the debate is only intensifying.
Read More:
0 Comments